New Myth #4: The ONLY way to get big legs is to squat.
Squatting provides the greatest amount of adaptive stress to the greatest number of major muscles in the upper leg. That simply means more bang for the buck.
More effect for the effort. But don't get the idea that squatting is all you have to do to get big legs!
There are many other exercises (listed already) that are necessary, but they're to be regarded as auxiliary to squatting! Why? Read Maddog's poem again!
New Myth #5: Narrow stance for the vastus lateralis sweep
While the inner and outer quads are activated via separate neural input, they function as a single unit for most intents because 1) the origin points of 3 of the quads
are so close together, 2) they share a common insertion and 3) the quads span such a long bone. There may be a bit of differentiation possible through foot
placement, but not so much that overall size takes a back seat to whatever meager shape changes you can effect.
Get big, and hope that the good Lord, in his infinite wisdom, gave you the genes necessary to have that pleasing "sweep" bodybuilders favor.
New Myth #6: Squats will give you a broad butt.
First, re-read my response to New Myth #5. Add to that bit of wisdom the fact that gluteal development is more often a genetic thing. Look at Tom Platz! No
hammer there! Lots of guys and gals squat without getting big butts. Wide, intermediate or narrow, it doesn't really make that much difference.
On the other hand, no advantage is ever gained by going real wide (beyond, say, 24-36 inches wide) for anyone other than powerlifters. So keep your stance
somewhere inside 24 inches or so, and you'll do great.
New Myth #7: Hack squat machines, Smith machines, leg press machines and the amazing plethora of other leg machines the past 30 years have witnessed are
all safer than squats, and just as effective. So why even bother with the old fashioned squat?
Folks, squint your eyes and watch as someone does hack squats. Likewise for leg presses. Tell me what you see! Visualize that person standing on the floor and
doing the precise same movement with the precise same body position. What do you see?
An unbelievably funky lookin' squat that isn't much good for much of anything.
Now, that's not to say that while in the machine (instead of standing on the floor doing the same movement) it's a worthless exercise! Hack squats have value. So
do sissy squats. So do leg presses. Most you us who live in the trench know them all. But don't tell me that they can take the place of squats! They are to be
considered auxiliary to squats. Only during injury are they ever to be considered replacements for squats


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote










Bookmarks