Redox negative feedback involving FOXO
ROS (and reactive nitrogen species, RNS) are not simply dangerous by-products, but essential
components of cell signalling pathways [53,54]. Low levels of ROS seem to promote growth,
whereas higher levels induce cell arrest [55]. ROS can active FOXO, which suggests that FOXO
act as a negative regulator on increased ROS production [42,56-58]. FOXO are also modulated by
AMPK – the archetypal energy sensor of the cell, which is itself activated by ROS [59,60]. FOXO
activity is suppressed by insulin signalling in the short term, but this suppression is lost in the
longer term – especially under stressful conditions, and involves a feed back loop that upregulates
components of the Akt insulin signalling pathway [57]. Hence, excessive growth signalling it tightly
modulated as it can result in excessive oxidative damage. Indeed, it has been proposed that
feeding is associated with increased oxidative stress and can be viewed as inflammatory [61].
Glucose can also directly modulate FOXO function via O-linked-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc),
improving resistance to oxidative stress [62]. In C.elegans, overexpression of O-GlcNac
transferase (OGT) can result in insulin resistance, whereas knocking out its function may improve
insulin signalling and is associated with suppressed dauer formation and increased carbohydrate
storage, but decreased lipid storage [63]. Indeed, increased flux through the hexosamine pathway
has been known to be associated with insulin resistance (and thus, diabetes) for many years;
addition of O-GlcNac is now a well described process to modulate the function of multiple proteins
[64]. This would support the idea that FOXO can oppose insulin signalling and glucose-induced
oxidative stress.
From an evolutionary perspective, some FOXOs are known to translocate to the nucleus in times
of fasting and/or oxidative stress, so improving somatic protection, but reducing energy allocation to growth and reproduction. However, after extended fasting, there is evidence, at least in C.
elegans, that they translocate back out of the nucleus in what appears to be an Akt-Pi3K
dependent mechanism. The explanation for this appears to be that somatic protection comes at an
energy cost (e.g. manufacture of anti-oxidant proteins), and once anti-oxidant defences have been
improved, the process is downregulated [65]. Thus, continual growth signalling and excessive
calories might cause FOXO to remain active and thus continue to be active in the metabolic
syndrome.
FOXO and nature of thriftiness
Failure to eat is a strong negative selective pressure, which has likely led to an imbalance between
orexigenic (stronger) and anorexic (weaker) signals, leading to high feed-efficiency and a
propensity to store fat [66-68]. As both inflammation, and feeding (via increased Akt signalling),
might act to suppress FOXO activity, but FOXO activity may be important in resistance to stress
via suppression of ROS – it could be argued that FOXO must be a powerful counter-regulatory
mechanism. Certainly, TNF-α is known to activate FOXO, which can then induce apoptosis [69].
However, inhibitor of kappa B kinase (IκBK), which also activates nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB),
can also inhibit members of the FOXO family [70], implying a finely tuned response around
modulation of potentially energy consuming immune responses. It is therefore of interest that a
high fat diet can induce a pro-inflammatory response in the hypothalamus and insulin resistance
[71], while chronically elevated levels of leptin can also induce leptin resistance – which may be
part of an obesity-driven vicious cycle [72]. These observations could be partly explained by FOXO
activity.
Two recent pieces of research suggest that redox is integral to the appetite/anorexic mechanism,
and integrate this action with the endocannabinoid system (ECS). Via activation of AMPK, ghrelin
results in increased mitochondrial oxidation of fatty acids, increased ROS and a concomitant
increase in anti-ROS mechanisms, including transcription of UCP-2 and increased mitochondrial
biogenesis. This has the overall effect of reducing mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS
production. Importantly, it appears that orexigenic neuropeptide Y/agouti-related protein (NPY &
AgRP) neurons become active in a low ROS situation, which is the opposite of anorexigenic pro-
opiomelanocortin/cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (POMC) cells,
which appear to
rely more on glucose and are more active at higher ROS levels. Hence, the orexigenic circuit may
rely more on fatty acids, whereas the anorexic one relies more on carbohydrate [73]. In another
study, via activation of PKC, ghrelin was found to activate diacylglycerol lipase (DGL), which
increases 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), so activating the CB-1 receptor: this then auto-activates
itself in a positive feed-forward loop involving PKC again. Without the involvement of CB-1, ghrelin
becomes ineffective [74].
This data suggests that the ECS is involved in altering cellular redox and that this may link in with FOXO and mitochondrial function, both of which are involved in appetite control.
Furthermore, it
also suggests that orexigenic circuits may well rely on lower levels of redox to function, whereas
anorexic ones rely on higher levels. Hence, excessive calorie intake, especially of high glycaemic
index carbohydrate, might induce the anorexic circuit to fail or down regulate to protect itself,
leaving the orexigenic one intact, as it has better oxidative stress resistance; it would also be more
likely to function during starvation, when lipids become the predominant fuel in the body. It would
also support the use of low carbohydrate diets, which can often reverse many symptoms of the
metabolic syndrome [75].
In summary, the above support the hypothesis that excessive insulin (and leptin) signalling can
increase oxidative stress. Hence, resisting the signalling is a vital counterbalance in survival and
fulfils a basic evolutionary paradigm of coupling food seeking and storage behaviour with
resistance to oxidative stress. Thus, FOXO may well epitomise thriftiness, and the default setting to
continual stress (e.g. over-eating) must be to maintain its activity.
Bookmarks